Carbon Conservation & Energy Efficiency


Bruce Rowse & Team

LED lighting update

November 2nd, 2009 at 7:10

In October 2008 we started an independent evaluation of LED lights as a substitute for fluorescent lighting. The evaluation was undertaken in partnership with the Sustainability Fund, managed by Sustainability Victoria, and with the support of Frankston City Council. We chose to focus on fluorescent lighting because this is by far the most common form of lighting used in commercial buildings.

The trial has involved firstly a desk-top evaluation of LED products, then selection of lamps from those six manufacturers who appeared to have the best products. These were then tested by CarbonetiX for light output and power consumption. The best performing lamp was then sent to a NATA certified laboratory for photometric testing.

The useful light provided by the best lamp in a standard office fluorescent fitting was similar to that of a used halo-phosphor fluoro tube – a surprising result as earlier testing we had undertaken indicated the LEDs were just not bright enough to be used as a fluorescent substitute.”

We then replaced 176 fluorescent tubes with the lamp that had performed best in our testing  in the Mahogany Neighbourhood Community Centre in the City of Frankston.  Users of the facility were surveyed before and after the upgrade and noted either no change or an improvement in the lighting. An illumination assessment showed that illumination levels after the upgrade were around the same as before. Yet power consumption has dropped from over 40 watts per lamp down to 18 watts.

In October we undertook another check up of the lamps, eight months after they were installed. Illumination levels were similar to when they were installed, and none of the LED lights had failed.  Eight months of operation is not nearly long enough to establish whether or not the lamps will operate for 50,000 hours or not as claimed by the manufacturer. But it is a good start.

LEDs as a fluorescent substitute are still expensive, with roughly a ten year return on investment in an office environment. But this trial indicates that if the technology continues to evolve and prices drop that LEDs could help halve the use the energy used by lighting in commercial buildings.

In June the US Department of Energy launched the $10 million “L Prize” for the development of a 21st century lamp that produces more than 150 lumens per watt (current lighting technology is around 100 lumens per watt).  It also challenged the industry to develop a 10 watt LED replacement for the 60 watt incandescent light bulb. Philips have already submitted an entry in the 10 watt incandescent replacement.

With stimulation like this LED technology can only improve.

Not withstanding this good news, a strong word of caution for the here and now is necessary. After our testing we had a lot of LEDs from a number of manufacturers lying around our office. So of course we took out our fluoro tubes and put them in. All of these LED tubes, from five different manufacturers, have now failed. My advice would be for anyone contemplating the use of LEDs – firstly make sure you are happy with the level of illumination provided, then secondly ask the supplier to provide a minimum 3 year or 15,000 hour guarantee, with lumen depreciation (loss of light output) to be no more than 10% over the 15,000 hours.

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , ,

3 Responses to “LED lighting update”

  1. David Lau Says:

    I spend one day totally on reading your company and your blog,I am attracted by what u said ,your professionity and unique insight has deeply impressed me,I beleve with our hard work,the glaobal will be more green,more harmonious,we are looking forward to cooperate with u,Dear Bruce,we are LED lighting manufacturer which is committed to energy saving for years,pls welcome to visit our website:,pls directly contact me when u are interested in us.
    Skype: welllausz

  2. Margaret Moorhouse Says:

    Dear Bruce

    The infant LED industry badly needs some manufacturing and advertising standards on which buyers can realistically rely. The light emitted by LEDs is different in many ways from incandescent and flourescent sources. I have been impressed with a Fijian company, BEBI, which (on their website) do their best to provide products suitable for their intended use (mainly navigation lights) and educate their potential buyers about the special properties of LEDs.

    This compares very well with several established boating mail order companies in Australia and other chandleries which have been cheerfully selling navigation lights which do not comply with the International (and Australian) Collision Regulations. These regs. fully specify the light properties for each required navigation light.

    For domestic use it is frequently impossible to ascertain the “brightness” of a lamp from the seller. This MUST change!

    Thank you for your information.

    Margaret Moorhouse

  3. Gabrielle Ross Says:

    Incandescent light bulbs will soon be phased out because they waste a lot of energy..~.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>